Greenhouse vs Ashby: Which ATS Is Better in 2026?

At a glance

	Greenhouse	Ashby
Best for	Growing companies that want structured hiring	Startups that want ATS, CRM, and analytics in one
Starting price	Custom pricing by hiring volume and complexity	$400 / month (Foundations, up to 100 employees)
Free plan or trial	No; demo required for a quote	No; monthly billing available on Foundations
Plans	Core, Plus and Pro	Foundations, Plus (101 to 1,000 employees) and Enterprise
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud
Structured hiring	Interview kits and scorecards on every plan	Interview plans and feedback built in
Sourcing and CRM	Sourcing and CRM on Core; sourcing automation and texting on Plus	Recruiting CRM built in; 200 email lookups included
Reporting	Reporting on Core; BI Connector on Plus	Built-in analytics; custom dashboards and alerts on Plus and Enterprise
Discounts and terms	Upgrade any time; terms quoted	10% off yearly plans; emerging market pricing available

Greenhouse is the better fit for growing companies that want structured, consistent hiring backed by a large integration marketplace, while Ashby suits startups and lean recruiting teams that want an ATS, recruiting CRM, scheduling and analytics in one product. Both are premium tools built for companies that hire steadily. The differences come down to how you buy, how you report and how many other tools you plan to connect.

We rate Greenhouse 4.7 out of 5 and Ashby 4.6, first and second on our ranked list of the best applicant tracking systems. Here is how they compare on the points recruiting leaders weigh most.

Structured hiring and interviews

Structured hiring is the idea Greenhouse was built on. Every job gets an interview plan, interview kits that tell each interviewer what to assess, and scorecards tied to the attributes the role requires. Hiring approvals keep offers in check. Because these tools sit on the Core plan, even a company’s first Greenhouse rollout pushes managers toward consistent evaluations.

Ashby supports interview plans and structured feedback as well, and it handles them competently. Its focus, though, is operational: moving candidates quickly, scheduling efficiently and measuring every stage. Teams that already have a strong interviewing culture will not miss much. Teams trying to build one will get more guidance from Greenhouse.

Winner: Greenhouse. Structured hiring is its core, and the defaults steer managers toward fair, comparable interviews.

Sourcing and recruiting CRM

Ashby includes a recruiting CRM in its all-in-one plans, so sourcers can build talent pools, send outreach emails and track passive candidates without a separate product. Every all-in-one plan includes 200 sourcing email lookups, and candidate texting is included with monthly or per-seat limits.

Greenhouse also includes sourcing and CRM features on Core, with prospects, prospect pools, bulk import and a Chrome plugin for prospecting. Sourcing automation, texting, contact lookups and email automation arrive on Plus, and Pro adds unlimited CRM events. Getting the full sourcing toolkit means buying a higher tier.

Winner: Ashby. More sourcing capability comes in the base product.

Scheduling

Greenhouse’s Core plan includes scheduling tools with interviewer preferences, candidate self-scheduling and scheduling links, plus interview reminders. That covers what most teams need.

Ashby builds scheduling into the product and sells an Advanced Scheduling add-on on Plus with an AI auto-scheduler, calendar holds and interviewer training. Companies running dozens of panel interviews a week will appreciate the extra automation, though it adds to the price.

Winner: tie. Both handle everyday scheduling well. Ashby goes further for high-volume teams willing to pay for the add-on.

Reporting and analytics

Reporting is Ashby’s clearest advantage. Its analytics are deep for an ATS, so recruiting leads can answer questions about pipeline speed, pass-through rates and interviewer load without exporting data. Plus and Enterprise add advanced filtering, custom dashboards, scheduled report delivery and custom alerts. Ashby even sells its analytics on their own to companies running another ATS.

Greenhouse offers solid pipeline reporting and analytics on Core, and Plus adds AI-powered report filters and a Business Intelligence Connector for teams that analyze hiring data in their own BI tools. Good reporting, but more of it lives outside the product.

Winner: Ashby. Its built-in analytics are among the strongest in the category.

Ease of use and setup

Greenhouse is familiar to many recruiters and hiring managers, which shortens training. Its structure is also its learning curve: someone has to design interview plans, scorecards and approval chains for each kind of role before the system pays off. Very small companies can find that more process than they need.

Ashby’s interface is fast and its daily workflows feel modern, but it has a long list of settings. Recruiting operations people tend to love that depth. Hiring managers only see a small part of it, so their experience stays simple, while the admin who configures the system needs time to learn it.

Winner: Greenhouse for hiring manager familiarity. Ashby for teams with a dedicated recruiting operations owner.

AI features and candidate experience

Both vendors now build AI into the product. Greenhouse includes an AI Notetaker and Talent Matching on Core, and Plus adds fraud and spam detection for applications. Ashby includes AI credits on every plan, 1,500 a month on Foundations, and sells its AI Notetaker as a paid add-on. Check how credits are counted before you rely on AI screening at volume.

For candidates, Greenhouse Core includes MyGreenhouse, interview reminders, candidate surveys and an internal job board. Ashby limits Foundations to one candidate survey and one offer template, with unlimited versions on Plus and Enterprise. Both offer self-scheduling, which candidates notice most.

Winner: Greenhouse. More AI and candidate experience features come on its entry plan.

Integrations

Greenhouse runs one of the largest integration marketplaces in recruiting, connecting to job boards, assessment vendors, background check providers, video tools and HR systems. If your team already relies on specialized tools, Greenhouse likely connects to them.

Ashby needs fewer integrations because it covers more ground itself. It still connects to common HR systems and calendars, but its catalog is smaller. Before choosing Ashby, list every tool you plan to keep and confirm each connection.

Winner: Greenhouse. More connections, which matters for complex recruiting stacks.

Pricing and total cost

Ashby publishes its entry price. The Foundations plan costs $400 a month for companies with up to 100 employees, with monthly or yearly payment and 10 percent off yearly plans. Plus covers 101 to 1,000 employees and Enterprise covers larger companies, both by quote. Watch the add-ons: single sign-on is listed at $100 a month on Foundations, and the AI Notetaker is a paid add-on on every plan.

Greenhouse does not publish prices. It sells Core, Plus and Pro plans, priced by hiring volume and complexity, and you need a demo to get a number. You can upgrade between plans at any time. Expect a higher total than Ashby Foundations for a small company, though the gap narrows as you grow.

Winner: Ashby for transparency and for small companies. Get quotes from both if you have more than 100 employees.

Security and compliance

Both vendors support single sign-on and permission controls. Greenhouse’s Pro plan adds enterprise-level data configuration, audit logs, a developer sandbox, resume anonymization and configurable session timeouts, and Plus includes fraud and spam detection with CLEAR identity verification. Ashby offers custom permission roles on Plus and Enterprise. Companies in regulated industries or with strict audit needs will find more controls documented on Greenhouse’s plans.

Winner: Greenhouse. Its upper tiers offer more security and anonymization controls.

The bottom line

Pick Greenhouse if your goal is consistent, defensible hiring across many managers and you need to connect a wide set of recruiting tools. Pick Ashby if you are a startup or lean team that wants one product for tracking, sourcing, scheduling and analytics, and you value a published price. Both reward teams that hire steadily. If you fill only a handful of roles a year, a lighter ATS will cost far less. Before signing either, run the same live role through both demos and compare how many clicks it takes a hiring manager to leave feedback.

Pros and cons

Greenhouse

Ashby

Which should you choose?

Frequently asked questions